High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Sunil Kamboj & Ors v. Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & - CWP-4244-2005  RD-P&H 3068 (11 May 2006)
DATE OF DECISION: 30-3-2006
Sunil Kamboj and others PETITIONERS.
Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & others RESPONDENTS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.BEDI
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA
PRESENT: Mr.R.K.Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG Punjab.
The petitioners have admittedly been granted the appointment as of now. The only claim that remains is that the petitioners being higher in the merit, their date of appointment should be from the date when their juniors had been appointed. We find merit in this plea. We accordingly dispose of this writ petition as infructuous with a further direction that the petitioners would be entitled to count their date of appointment from the date when their juniors had got appointment for all intents and purposes, but they will not be entitled to payment of any arrears of salary. Dasti.
30-3-2006 (VINOD K.SHARMA)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.