Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

N.A versus N.A.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


n.a v. n.a. - CRM-47031-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 6021 (28 August 2006)

Criminal Misc. No. 47031 of 2006

in CRA No. 781-DB of 2003

Present:- Mr. Aseem Rai, Advocate for applicant-appellant.

Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, DAG, Punjab.


Learned counsel for the appellant states that appellant- Rajinder Kumar has undergone more than 5 years and 4 months of actual sentence and more than 2 years and 8 months of sentence after conviction.

Appeal to mature will take some time.

Sentence of appellant-Rajinder Kumar is suspended, during the pendency of the appeal.

Bail to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patiala.




September 7, 2006 JUDGE



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.