Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHARANJEET SINGH & ORS. versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Charanjeet Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab - CRM-46907-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8283 (10 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.46907-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:16.10.2006

Charanjeet Singh & Ors. ..........Petitioners Versus

State of Punjab ..........Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- Shri Arihant Jain, Advocate

and Shri Arun Jindal, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Shri N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab.

Shri R.L. Batta, Sr. Advocate

with Shri M.K. Sajjan, Advocate

for the complainant.

****

Petitioners Charanjeet Singh, Paramjeet Singh, Harmeet Singh and Jagdish Singh apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 381 dated 26.6.2006 under Sections 324/323/326/506/148/149 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Patiala, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

This order may be read in continuation of the order dated 10.8.2006.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that all the petitioners have been attributed simple injuries and in view of the aforesaid order, they have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from Faqir Singh, Head Constable does not dispute this fact and further states that the petitioner is no more required for further interrogation.

In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 10.8.2006 is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

October 16, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.