Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.B. ANIL KUMAR versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.B. ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF KERALA - WP(C) No. 30422 of 2006(V) [2006] RD-KL 1866 (24 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 30422 of 2006(V)

1. P.B. ANIL KUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R),

3. VILLAGE OFFICER,

4. SECRETARY,

5. PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :24/11/2006

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C)No.30422 of 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated: 24th November, 2006



JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioner is that even as the appeal Ext.P1 and stay petition Ext.P2 filed by him are pending before the Committee of the 5th respondent-Panchayat Committee, the Panchayat is threatening to initiate coercive process for recovery of the amounts which were advanced under the 'Abhaya Bhavana Nirman Padhathi'. Going by the dates shown in Exts.P1 and P2, they were filed wayback in July, 2005. Mr.K.S.Hariharaputhran, learned counsel for the petitioner asserts that even now Exts.P1 and P2 are pending. Under these circumstances, this Writ Petition will stand disposed of at this stage itself even without issuing notice to the respondents: If Exts.P1 and P2 are actually pending with the 5th respondent, the 5th respondent will take up Exts.P1 and P2, hear the petitioner and dispose of them in accordance with law at its earliest and at any rate within six weeks of their receiving a copy of this judgment together with a copy of the writ petition and all the exhibits. Till such time as Exts.P1 and P2 are disposed of by the 5th respondent, W.P.C.No. 30422/06 - 2 - coercive action will not be taken by the Panchayat against the petitioner for recovery of the amounts allegedly due.

srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.