Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THOMSUN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THOMSUN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4125 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 326 (20 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4125 of 2006()

1. THOMSUN, S/O. OUSO,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.S.RAJEEV

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :20/07/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A.4125/2006

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner is the second accused, in C.R.No.18/2004 of Paravur Excise Range. The allegation is that the petitioner, along with the first accused, was found in illegal possession of thirty liters of illicit arrack, on 31.7.2004. The first accused was arrested on the same day. The second accused could not be arrested. The facts reveal, as submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, that on the submission of the first accused, the second accused, the petitioner herein, is also implicated. Hence the petitioner is before this Court, under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. After hearing the counsel as well as the public Prosecutor, I direct the petitioner to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, North Paravur, on 26.7.2006 at 11.00 a.m., and move an application for bail, in which event the learned Magistrate shall consider the B.A.4125/2006 2 same and release the petitioner on bail, imposing such conditions which are deemed necessary. However I make it clear that if the investigating officer desires to have the petitioner, the second accused, for interrogation, he may move an application before the Court below for the custody, which also shall be considered by the learned Magistrate, according to the law and dispose of it, after hearing both sides. The application is disposed of as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.