High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
SARADAMANI T. v. MATTANCHERRY MAHAJENIK URBAN CO-OP - WP(C) No. 16249 of 2006(H)  RD-KL 752 (13 September 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWP(C) No. 16249 of 2006(H)
1. SARADAMANI.T, (JUNIOR CLERK),
2. SUJITH, (JUNIOR CLERK),
3. SANDHYA.P.K, (JUNIOR CLERK),
4. GOPAKUMAR, (JUNIOR CLERK),
5. ANIL KUMAR, (JUNIOR CLERK),
6. KRISHNA KUMAR (PEON),
7. BAIJUMON (PEON),
8. MANOHARAN (PEON),
1. MATTANCHERRY MAHAJENIK URBAN CO-OP.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
For Petitioner :SRI.P.P.JACOB
For Respondent :SMT.P.A.ANITHA
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN
O R D E RW.P.(C). NO. 16249 OF 2006 1
K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGEW.P.(C). NO. 16249 OF 2006
Dated this the 13th day of September, 2006
The grievance of the petitioners is that inspite of Ext.P3 judgment and the fact that petitioners were appointed in the regular vacancies, they are not given the benefits available to regular employee of the bank. The petitioners approached this court for the same purpose and this court observed that the matter has to be considered by the Managing Committee. Still the petitioners are not given the benefits in par with the other regular employees of the bank. The counsel appearing for the respondent bank now submits that the bank is being controlled by the Reserve Bank of India and on the regulations being issued by the Reserve Bank of India. Without getting proper orders from the Reserve Bank of India, the bank is not in a position to allow the claim of the petitioners. Admittedly the petitioners are appointed in the regular vacancies and if so they are entitled for the benefit in par with the other employees. It is contended before this court that in order to get benefits the respondent-bank should have taken immediate steps to get the sanction of the Reserve Bank. W.P.(C). NO. 16249 OF 2006 2 However, it is declared that the petitioners are entitled for the benefits claimed. Hence the bank is directed to take immediate steps for granting the benefits to the petitioners and this shall be done within three months from the receipt of this judgment and shall allow the benefits to the petitioners at the earliest. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGE.RV/ W.P.(C). NO. 16249 OF 2006 3
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.