Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

G. SASIKUMAR, THUNDIL PUTHEN VEEDU versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


G. SASIKUMAR, THUNDIL PUTHEN VEEDU v. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT - WP(C) No. 30991 of 2006(M) [2007] RD-KL 13102 (16 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 30991 of 2006(M)

1. G. SASIKUMAR, THUNDIL PUTHEN VEEDU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HANDLOOM & TEXTILES,

3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.B.JAYASURYA

For Respondent :SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :16/07/2007

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).No. 30991 OF 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 16th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this court seeking to regularise the period of suspension and disburse the resultant benefits. A direction is sought to revise the pension sanctioned from 01-04-2006 including the suspension period of the petitioner after sanctioning the increments due during the suspension period.

2. I heard counsel for the third respondent also. He submits that proceedings against the petitioner has been dropped. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the period of suspension may be regularised. In this regard, third respondent submits that if the petitioner submits a representation before the third respondent, a decision will be taken thereon in accordance with law. He also submits that terminal benefits will be disbursed to the petitioner within three months from today. WPC No.30991/06 2 The writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to disburse the entire terminal benefits to the petitioner within three months from today. Further, if the petitioner moves a representation within three weeks from today seeking regularisation of the period of suspension, an appropriate decision in accordance with law thereon will be taken by the third respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the key of the depot continues with the petitioner and though he made an attempt to give it back to the third respondent, he is not receiving it. Counsel for the third respondent submits that if the petitioner hands over the key of the depot to the third respondent, he will receive it. This is recorded.

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sv. WPC No.30991/06 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.