Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C.R. RUKMINI, W/O.T.K. SANKARAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C.R. RUKMINI, W/O.T.K. SANKARAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 356 of 2007(P) [2007] RD-KL 158 (3 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 356 of 2007(P)

1. C.R. RUKMINI, W/O.T.K. SANKARAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. A.K. AYYAPPAN, ALAKKADA HOUSE,

For Petitioner :SRI.DEEPU THANKAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :03/01/2007

O R D E R

K.K. DENESAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 356 OF 2007 P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 3rd January, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Alleging illegal termination of the service of the petitioner from the post of Sweeper, the petitioner has filed a grievance petition before the 1st respondent requesting to pass orders reinstating her in service as expeditiously as possible based on the guidelines issued in G.O.(P) No. 501/2005/Fin. dated 25-11-2005. The petitioner will file a copy of the representation before the head of the department where she was employed so that, that representation will be forwarded to the Government along with the remarks of that officer for due consideration by the Government. This shall be done by the petitioner within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. On receipt of the representation by the head of the office along with the copy of the judgment, the same shall be forwarded to the Government through the head of the department for appropriate consideration and orders. The Government on receipt of the remarks from the head of the office routed through the head of the department WPC No. 356/2007 -2- shall issue notice to the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, afford them an opportunity of being heard, if they respond to the notice, and take appropriate decision on Ext. P2. This shall be done within two months on receipt of the remarks from the head of the office by the Government. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. K.K. DENESAN

JUDGE

jan/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.