Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUDHEER @ AKKU, AGED 27 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SUDHEER @ AKKU, AGED 27 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 5078 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 16243 (21 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5078 of 2007()

1. SUDHEER @ AKKU, AGED 27 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :21/08/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

B.A.No.5078 of 2007

Dated this the 21st day of August 2007

O R D E R

Application for regular bail. The petitioner is the sixth accused. He, along with the co-accused, faces allegations inter alia under Section 395 I.P.C. The crux of the allegations is that in furtherance of prior concert, accused 1 to 3 came in a motor cycle at the scene of the occurrence. One of them stopped the two wheeler in which the de facto complainant was proceeding after closing his shop carrying substantial amount of cash and gold ornaments and robbed all the gold and cash. Accused 4,5 and 6 were allegedly present at the scene of the crime in a car. After prior concert of all the accused the offence was allegedly committed by accused 1 to 3. There is a further allegation that the motor cycle involved was removed by this petitioner after the occurrence. Allegedly, recovery has also been effected from the petitioner after his arrest on 23/7/2007.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. He prays that the petitioner may now be enlarged on bail. B.A.No.5078/07 2

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application and in the circumstances of this case, I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. Another bail application of the co-accused has also dismissed by me, as per order in B.A.No.5069/2007 dated 21/8/2007. I am satisfied that the petitioner herein does not also deserve to be enlarged on bail.

4. In the result, this petition is dismissed. However, I may hasten to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move this court or the Sessions court for bail again at later stages of the investigation not, at any rate, prior to 04/09/2007. The investigating officer shall, in the meantime, make every endeavour to complete the investigation.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge B.A.No.5078/07 3 B.A.No.5078/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.