Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KUNJUMON S/O TITUS versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KUNJUMON S/O TITUS v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 5538 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 17397 (17 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5538 of 2007()

1. KUNJUMON S/O TITUS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :17/09/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

B.A.No.5538 of 2007

Dated this the 17th day of September 2007

O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces allegations under the Kerala Abkari Act. Investigation is complete. Final report has already been filed. Cognizance has been taken by the learned Magistrate. Summons has been issued after taking cognizance. The petitioner has not been arrested so far. He apprehends that when he appears and applies for bail, his application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. He, therefore, prays that directions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. may be issued to the learned Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail when he appears and applies for bail. The petitioner further submits that there is no worthwhile allegations also against the petitioner.

2. I am of the opinion that it is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail. I find absolutely no reason to invoke the extraordinary equitable discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application B.A.No.5538/07 2 for bail to be filed by the petitioner on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have been issued in Alice George vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339].

3. In the result, this bail application is dismissed but with the specific observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself.

4. Needless to say, the petitioner's application for regular bail will have to be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits under Section 437 Cr.P.C in the light of the dictum in Sukumari v. State of Kerala [2001(1)KLT 22]).

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge B.A.No.5538/07 3 B.A.No.5538/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.