Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VARKEY ALIAS, S/O.VARKEY, THOTTUMKAL versus THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


VARKEY ALIAS, S/O.VARKEY, THOTTUMKAL v. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - WP(C) No. 19695 of 2005(T) [2007] RD-KL 3391 (14 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 19695 of 2005(T)

1. VARKEY ALIAS, S/O.VARKEY, THOTTUMKAL
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
... Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION

4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,

For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)

For Respondent :SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :14/02/2007

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH J. W.P(C)No.19695 of 2005

Dated this the 14th day of February, 2007



JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:-

(i) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents to immediately finalise the amounts payable to the petitioner as per Ext.P1 agreement and effect actual payment of the same without unnecessary delay. In the statement filed on behalf of the 3rd respondent the stand taken is that only due to non-co-operation of the petitioner steps could not be taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the required steps have been taken including submission of the final bill before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the grievance of the petitioner with notice to him and take appropriate action in accordance with law to settle the grievance of the petitioner and disburse the eligible amounts within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that in respect of dispute, if any, surviving after the consideration of the matter by the second respondent including that of W.P(C)NO.19695/2005 interest, it will be open to the petitioner to approach the civil court, in which event the time taken by the petitioner for prosecuting this writ petition shall be excluded from the period of limitation. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)

ahg.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.