Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABY NITHIRATHIL, AGED 30 YEARS versus NITHIRATHIL MONICCA, AGED 63 YEARS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABY NITHIRATHIL, AGED 30 YEARS v. NITHIRATHIL MONICCA, AGED 63 YEARS - WP(C) No. 22926 of 2006(D) [2007] RD-KL 449 (8 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 22926 of 2006(D)

1. BABY NITHIRATHIL, AGED 30 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. NITHIRATHIL MONICCA, AGED 63 YEARS,
... Respondent

2. SHIRLY NITHIRATHIL, AGED 32 YEARS,

For Petitioner :SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS

For Respondent :SRI.M.V.AMARESAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.K.SHAMSUDDIN (RETD. JUDGE)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN (RETD.JUDGE)

Dated :08/01/2007

O R D E R

P.K.SHAMSUDDIN (RETD. JUDGE) &

T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN (RETD. JUDGE)

W.P(C) No. 22926 OF 2006

Dated this the 8th day of January, 2007

A W A R D P.K.SHAMSUDDIN (Rtd. Judge) We heard the counsel for the petitioner and 1st respondent, who is the only contesting respondent in the case. The petitioner and first respondent also appeared in person. After discussion the parties agreed to settle the whole disputes. In terms of the settlement the 1st respondent will sell the property with an extent of 94 cents in Survey Number 38/2 of Parappa Village and another extent of 82 cents in the same Survey Number to the petitioner on payment of Rs.5,50,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs and fifty thousand only) towards the consideration. The amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) will be paid by the petitioner on or before 22.1.07 and the remaining Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs and fifty thousand only) will be paid on or before 30.3.2007. On receipt of the full consideration of Rs.5,50,000/- the 1st respondent has agreed to execute the document transferring the property in favour of the petitioner within one week of the receipt of the full consideration mentioned above. The 1st respondent also will sign necessary documents for change of Patta after the transfer of the property. All the disputes in writ petition are disposed of as above. P.K.SHAMSUDDIN

(RETD. JUDGE)

T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN

(RETD. JUDGE)

jp

? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

+AS No. 1016 of 1998() #1. V.KUNHIKANNAN NAIR
... Petitioner

Vs

$1. P.V.KUNHAPPAN NAIR
... Respondent

! For Petitioner :SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD

For Respondent :SRI.C.P.KUNJHIKANNAN

*Coram

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.M.PAREED PILLAY(RETD.CHIEF JUSTICE)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD.JUDGE)

% Dated :05/01/2007

: O R D E R

M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) &

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE)

A.S. No. 1016 OF 1998(D)

Dated this the 5th day of January, 2007

A W A R D M.M.PAREED PILLAY (Rtd. Chief Justice) Both parties have settled the matter. It has been agreed to give a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) more to the respondent in full settlement of the claim. This amount will be paid on or before 28.2.2007, failing which it should be open to the respondent to realise the entire amount as per the decree. OP is settled as stated above. M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR

(RETD. JUDGE)

jp


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.