High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
ABIN GEORGE, S/O. GEORGE P.V. v. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS - WP(C) No. 24414 of 2006(F)  RD-KL 6516 (29 March 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMWP(C) No. 24414 of 2006(F)
1. ABIN GEORGE, S/O. GEORGE P.V.,
2. BINULAL P.B., S/O.P.K.BALAKRISHNAN,
3. KIRAN SEBAN, D/O. DEVASIA,
4. SREEVIDYA T.P., D/O.BALAKRISHNAN T.,
5. DIVYA P., D/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR,
1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,
2. THE REGISTRAR,
3. THE PRINCIPAL,
4. THE SECRETARY,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.SATHEESH
For Respondent :SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
O R D E R
K.M.JOSEPH, J.W.P.(C).No.24414 OF 2006
Dated this the 29th day of March, 2007
The prayers in the writ petition are as follows: This court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents 1 and 2 ordering and directing them to publish the 1st year revaluation results of the petitioners well in advance so as to enable the petitioners to take part in the 2nd year examination. This court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents directing them to receive WPC No.24414/06 2 examination fee from the petitioners and permitting the petitioners to write 2nd year examination beginning on 22-09-2006 and announce the results.
2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel for the University.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, even after revaluation petitioners 2 and 5 have failed. According to him. however, petitioners 1, 3 and 4 have passed and he prays that their results in the second year examination may be directed to be declared.
4. Learned standing counsel for the University submits that as far as petitioners 1 and 3 are concerned, they had passed in the first year and they were eligible to sit in the second year examination and their results can be declared by the University. As far as 4th petitioner is concerned, the 4th petitioner had not passed the first year examination before the second year examination and therefore his results in the second year cannot be declared, it is submitted. WPC No.24414/06 3
5. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the first respondent to declare the result of petitioners 1 and 3 in the second year examination within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. As far as the 4th petitioner is concerned, it is open to the 4th respondent to approach the Vice-Chancellor seeking orders in the matter. K.M.JOSEPH
JUDGEsv. WPC No.24414/06 4
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.