High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
BALAK NATH & ORS. v STATE & ORS. - CW Case No. 2249 of 2005  RD-RJ 858 (15 April 2005)
S.B.Civil Writ Petition NO.2249/2005
Balak Nath and ors. vs State of Rajasthan & Ors.
DATE OF ORDER : - 15.4.2005
HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J.
Mr. Ranjeet Joshi, for the petitioners.
Mrs. RR Kanwar, Dy.GA, for the respondent.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the names of the petitioners are entered in the jamabandi and are sought to be changed by the revenue authorities on the basis of Government order dated 6th
March, 2003 and which is not permissible in view of various judgments delivered by this Court.
In view of the above, the petitioners have apprehension that their name will be deleted by setting aside the mutation already opened in the name of the petitioner merely because of the Government order dated 6th March, 2003. It is submitted this Court has disposed of several writ petitions and quashed the mutation orders which were passed only after following the direction as issued in the order of the Government dated 6.3.2003 and this Court directed that no revenue entry be changed without giving opportunity of hearing to the concerned persons whose names are already in the revenue record.
In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities not to change the entries made in the revenue record in the name of the petitioners without following the procedure of law and without giving full opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
(Prakash Tatia), J. s.phophaliya/-
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.