High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
RAJESH v SUNITA - CMA Case No. 753 of 2003  RD-RJ 1111 (15 May 2006)
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 753/2003
Date : 15.05.2006
HON'BLE MR. BHAGWATI PRASAD, J.
Mr. Usman Ghani for the appellant.
Mr. Vinay Shrivastava for the respondent. == = =
The appellant is absent. The respondent is present. It has been revealed that the appellant has taken another woman in his fold. Still, the respondent wife says that she is prepared to accomodate her husband but his absence shows that he is not prepared to reconcile. Therefore, attempts of reconciliation ends in futility. His absence on the appointed date fortified this inference. The case will be now heard on merits.
Put up on 23.05.2006
(BHAGWATI PRASAD), J. bjsh
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.