Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHAVANI SINGH versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BHAVANI SINGH v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 1689 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 1523 (11 July 2006)

S.B. Criminal Misc. II Bail Application No.1689/2006

Date : 11.07.2006

HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J.

Mr. R.K. Charan for the applicant.

Mr. Vishnu Kachawaha, Public Prosecutor.

I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order.

The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that infact it is correct that the vehicle from which the contraband material was recovered was of the applicant but when the driver was driving the vehicle, he stayed somewhere on the way and thereafter it is alleged that contraband material was kept in the vehicle. According to learned counsel in the present case atleast the prosecution is required to show that that the applicant was having remote knowledge that the vehicle was used for the purpose of transporting contraband material. He further submits that the applicant was not found with the vehicle, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. In support of his statement, he placed reliance on an order passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application

No.2204/2006( Mal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan) dated 01.06.2006.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that in view of the statement of Bhagirath Singh available in file at page No.49, it would proper that the applicant was having knowledge that the vehicle was used for the purpose of transporting contraband material.

I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the statement of Bhagirath Singh available at Page No.49.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after reading statement of Bhagirath Singh, I am of the opinion that in this case the applicant has made out a case for releasing him on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Bhavani Singh son of Khiv Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.418/2005 P.S. Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of

Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.