Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

S.B.B.J. versus GOKUL & ORS.

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


S.B.B.J. v GOKUL & ORS. - CFA Case No. 56 of 1985 [2006] RD-RJ 46 (5 January 2006)

,

-:: ::- : : %. !

( ! /1 /4 : 56/1985

***** 7 4 : 5 9, 2006

-: :- =

ABC FB A ..B

D D :

A B BBFA, BS BB B X

([ SB\ 22.4.1985 [ BBA ] BS9-ABC CD C `

ABD ( ! [ D ! [ % D f(D C [ BA

BgS A j 9\ B

D ] FAj

BB B D (X B B jB D (X D BB

D

BB % B A, A (9 BCX A(D ( !B %, g\

A ] A , B ([ SpB SBB B %, B 9

D % , : B ABC BB BS9-D f(D C \B 3, 4 5 B BB, BS9 \B 6,7,8 9 B SB BS9-

D D

D f(D C B BB B B B B ! !

F- ` ] 9 A B, [ D [ %

D

DD BB FAj BB X B A B B,

D ] A 9 \ ` !SBD \! ! D

D BS9 \B 1 2 jB { BB SB A D BS9-`

B\ D B B BX B BS9 ` ] BFB

D D

BB BS B }9 B BS9 \B 10

BB [ B S9 jA

FAj BB BB B D BS [B B

D

BS9 [ B S [

D BS9 [ D B

D 9\ [ FAj BB BB B [B BS9 D ] [ ] gF B B [ B B jB, B BB B 12,985.60 [ Bj !

([ B [ A B ] [ SBA BS9

BS9 SB ] D S F ] [ SBA 9\ [

BS- %B \B 3 ] \ BAB BS9 `

D

B B g B % S

BA BS A BS9 [ ([ B [ ] D D

D ! 9 BS9 ` A ! BS9 \. 1 D 9 B

D \! D BS9 \B 10 B B ] g

D D

B

D gF B B SBD [ B9 D !BD B BBB B A SBB B

X ([ BS9-` BB A

D

A D [ B B B 9\ SB SBD [

B SBB BB B jB SpBD SBB D BgA

B X [ S D B SBB B %

B!B Bg !B 9\ % \ !F B jB, D !B 9 SBB B jB

B ABC BB X B B 12,985.60 %D B SBB B B jB, B SD 34 11 A.A.A. BFBf SD D !, g\ F SBB

D

B B jB B B FB S jD f ] [ SBA A jA, FB B [ B SBD [ !

B BBB 11 X [ S D SB

D

BA B jA B ABC D D jX ]

X

BB 1994 (9 D (BjB) 152 (B B

D \B D `), 1971 (BjB) 38 (ABB B

B %.), 1984 (\B ( BB) 209 (CD C `

(B B %. A BC X) D

A B BB BB A S9BA j A \B 130/1976, CD C ` ABD ( ! B D BB %. ]

B X SB\ 11.1.1988 [ A D [ B

X !F ] B ! jB 9 SpBD SBB D BgA

B SBB BB B jB SBD [ SBB BB

B jB

DD BB f B S g B B

X

B B \B D ` ( ) BD ] ` BB

B [ S !F ] [ BA % CBB BX ] 9\ BB B % jB B [ S S D B SD SB

BB % BX B B A BB B

D

B B BAOE `f BB SD D !F B

BB % A !B B SBB BB B

ABB B B %. ( ) BD ] SD 34 11, 7(1) (c) (i) BFBf [ BB [ %

D

(redemption) BS ] B !F % A !B B

D D

SBB BB B, BB 9\ D

F % , ] 12 B [ S F 9\

BB B jB

A B CD C ` (B B A BC X

( ) BD ] A SD 34 11 A.A.A. BFBf [

D

BB [ % ] A !F S !B 9 BS9 B

D

B D B FB9 %, B SB B % ] g B B 9 jA, D 9\ BB

B B BS B B B 12,985.60 %D ! 12,985.60 %D [ Bj ([ BS9

D

B9 [ % A B B SB D B

SB B % F ] BS9 SB 9\ D `

BS- %B 3 ] \ BB B B

D g D B X B B % [ 7 X ] SpBD SBB D BgA

D

B [ B CB B BBB S9, B A

B FAj BB D 9\ SB D9 B ] FAj

BB BB BFBf B 9 D 9\ B 9 SD 34 11 A.A.A. BFBf B 9 D

D

B % ` BB SB B jB F A B

B jB B f ] Bf SD D !

B [ S, !F %, ] SB 9\ D 11

X [ S D B [ X A jA, : SpBD SBB D

BgA B BS9 BS9 D 4 X jB

D 11 X [ S D B D B FB9 B

B ABC BB B B SBD [

X

B BBB 11 X [ S D SB ! D

BA B jA, BD ] DD BB B B B \ f

B B B DD BB SD 34 11 A.A.A. B

B B, B % :

"Order XXXIV. SUITS RELATING TO MORTGAGES OF

IMMOVABLE PROPERTY. 11 Payment of interest.-- In any decree passed in a suit for forclosure, sale or redemption, where interest is legally recoverable, the

Court may order payment of interest to the mortgagee as follows, namely:-

(a) interest up to the date on or before which payment of the amount found or declared due is under the preliminary decree to be made by the mortgagor or other person redeeming the mortgage-

(i) on the principal amount found or declared due on the mortgage,-at the rate payable on the principal, or, where no such rate is fixed, at such rate as the Court deems reasonable,

(ii) [* * *], and

(iii)on the amount adjudged due to the mortgagee for costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by the mortgagee in respect of the mortgage-security up to the date of the preliminary decree and added to the mortgage-money,-at the rate agreed between the parties, or, failing such rate, [at such rate not exceeding six per cent per annum as the

Court deems reasonable]; and

(b) Subsequent interest up to the date of realisation or actual payment on the aggregate of the principal sums specified in clause (a) as calculated in accordance with that clause at such rate as the Court deems reasonable."

B B \B SD 34 11 D,

D D ] B ABC BB B B SBD

X [ 12,985.60 %D B SBB BB jB, BD 9\ !

B SD 34 11 BFBf D % g

D

A % 9 B SBB B B % B !F % A !B SBB BB B

D f ] Bf SD D ! SD 34 11 B B \B BFB SD D !, ]

D

B FAj BB BB B FB SpBD SBB D

D

BgA B [ S D SBB %, 9\ jB ] SB 9\ [ %, B 11

X [ S D A % \ g B B [ A %, : B SpBD SBB D BgA 11 X [ S D B BS9-ABC B D B

B D A ABC \: D AB [

BA % FAj BB X ([ SB\ 22.4.1985 ]

D

B \ F B BB % B9 SBB 17.4.1982 D BgA

B B g ABC-BS9 BS9 D 4

X [ S D B jB 11 X [ S

D

D B B D B FB9 B

B!B ([ BX BB BD

( = ) ..


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.