Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT.INDRA DEVI versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SMT.INDRA DEVI v STATE - CRLAB Case No. 256 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 1450 (21 March 2007)

D.B. Cr. Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.256/2007

In

D.B. Criminal Appeal No.109/2007

Date : 21.03.2007

HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J.

HON'BLE MR DEO NARAYAN THANVI, J.

Mr. Deepak Menaria for the applicant/appellant.

Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the statements of the witnesses and also the medical evidence, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, we deem it proper to suspend the sentence award to the applicant.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that sentence passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track)

Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No.50/2006 (old No.25/2006) against the accused applicant Smt. Indra Devi w/o Ratanlal Acharya shall remain suspended till the final disposal of the aforesaid criminal appeal provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- and two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for her appearance before this Court on the conditions indicated below :- 23rd April,

(i) That she will appear before this Court on 2007.

(ii) That she will appear before the trial court in the months of January and June of every year till the appeal is decided.

(iii) That if the appellant changes the place of residence, she will give in writing her changed address to the trial court as well as to her counsel in the High Court.

(iv) Similarly, if the sureties change their address(es), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial court.

The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to the Sessions Case in which the accused-appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference.

Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused appellant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

(DEO NARAYAN THANVI), J. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.