Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAJJAN SINGH CHAWLA versus STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SAJJAN SINGH CHAWLA v STATE OF RAJ AND ORS - CW Case No. 5984 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 3861 (9 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5984/2007

SAJJAN SINGH CHAWLA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

Date: 09.08.2007.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE

Mr. A.K. Gupta for the petitioner.

****

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner being a deed writer and prayed that the respondents may be directed to cancel the allotments letters of the persons who have sub-letted their thdies/kiosks to their relatives or other persons. The petitioner further seeks writ, order or direction to lodge complaint against such persons who have violated the conditions of allotment order.

To this effect, the petitioner represented before the Collector as well as Divisional

Commissioner, Jaipur, but no order whatsoever has been passed on the representation so filed by the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking aforesaid writ, order or directions.

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner without serving notice for demand of justice. Further the petitioner also filed representations before the

Collector and Divisional Commissioner as he has pointed out irregularities committed by the allotters and sub- letted by the original allottees to other persons and the same are still pending.

As observed herein above, the present writ petition is filed by the petitioner without serving notice for demand of justice, therefore, this Court cannot issue any writ, order or direction to this effect. However, the petitioner is given liberty to represent before the Collector and the Divisional

Commissioner and they shall consider the representation so filed by the petitioner and shall pass appropriate order in accordance with the provisions of law and the same shall be communicated to the petitioner.

For these reasons, I find no merit in the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition, being premature, fails and the same is hereby dismissed.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.