High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Fateh Mohammad & Another v. State Of U.P. Thru' Finance & Revenue & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 68345 of 2005  RD-AH 5121 (28 October 2005)
Hon. S. K. Singh, J.
Although on the ground that the petitioners have paid the entire outstanding dues and thus recovery is not proper, earlier also petitioners came to this Court by filing writ petition no. 62566 of 2005 in which in respect to the grievance of the petitioners that no statement of account has been given so as to enable the petitioners to know that how any amount can be said to be in default, this Court directed the respondent bank to decide the petitioners representation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order but inspite of service of the copy of order of this Court statement of account has not been given and, therefore, this petition has been filed, although petitioners may have a remedy to file the contempt petition.
Be as it may, submission is that if the respondents are called upon to file response then petitioners may be saved of unnecessary harassment.
In view of the aforesaid, learned Advocate who has accepted notice for the respondent bank and learned Standing Counsel may file their counter affidavit by the next date.
List this matter in the week commencing 12.12.2005.
Counsel for the petitioners undertakes to inform about this order in writing to the learned counsel for the respondent bank by 9.11.2005.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.