Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANGAT RAM versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mangat Ram v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 37509 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12183 (25 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

"Court No. 4"

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 37509 of 2006.

Mangat Ram

Versus

State of U.P. and others

..............

Hon'ble Anjani Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

The petitioner, aggrieved by the order dated 7th October, 2005, passed by Tehsildar/Assistant Collector, whereby the Tehsildar concerned found that the notice issued under Section 122-B (4-A) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (In short 'the Act') upon the petitioner is sufficient and the petitioner has been declared un-authorised occupant of the land in dispute in his possession and directed eviction of the petitioner from the land in dispute and also payment of damages of Rs.38,600/-, approached the revisional Court/Collector by means of revision.  The revisional Court by the order dated 1st June, 2006 under Section 333, read with Section 122-B (4-A) of 'the Act' has affirmed the findings arrived at by the Tehsildar with regard to the petitioner's being un-authorised occupant and further the petitioner is liable to pay the damages and dismissed the revision filed by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner could not demonstrate that the orders impugned in the present writ petition in any way suffer from any error of law, much less manifest error of law, so as to warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

In view of what has been stated above, this writ petition has no force and is accordingly dismissed.  However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Dated: 25.07.2006.

Rks.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.