Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NAGENDRA SINGH @ SETHI versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Nagendra Singh @ Sethi v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15190 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 12393 (27 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

The prosecution story of this case, in brief, is that  in the present case the F.I.R. has been lodged by Ashok Kumar Gupta at P.S. Kotwali on  10.8.2005 at 7.15 p.m. in respect of the incident which had occurred on 10.8.2005 at 6.20 p.m. In the F.I.R. co-accused Rajdhani and Pappu alias Dharmendra have been named and two miscreants  were unknown. It is alleged that co-accused Dharmendra alias Pappu was arrested on the spot, but the name of the applicant was disclosed by the first informant on the same day in his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr. P. C.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the name of the applicant has been disclosed  by the first informant after thought. If the applicant was known to the first informant his name should have been mentioned in the F.I.R. It is further contended that according to statement also the applicant has not caused injury , because the role of causing  injury is assigned to co-accused Rajdhani. It is further contended that co-accused Pappu alias Dharmendra, who was arrested on the spot,  has been released on bail on 20.6.2006 in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 23101 of 2005. The case of the applicant is on the better footing with the case of above mentioned co-accused.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and  the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant  and without expressing any opinion on the the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Nagendra Singh alias Sathi  involved in Case Crime No. 160  of 2006, under Sections 307 and 302 /34 I.P.C. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Kotwali City, District Etah  be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two   sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Dt: 27.7.2006

Rcv-15190-06                                                                                                        


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.