Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAHID KHAN versus SSTATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shahid Khan v. Sstate Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19623 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16243 (18 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Shahid Khan   indicted in case crime No. 160  of 2006  under sections 498-A, 307, 324, 504, 506  I.P.C. and section 3/ 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. Parikshitgarh  District Meerut.

Heard Shri Satyendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that First Information Report was lodged two days after the incident and medical examination was conducted on 5.6.2006. The learned counsel argued that injuries are of simple nature. The learned counsel submitted that applicant and co-accused were bringing the complainant to marital home after compromise, therefore, there was no occasion for subjecting her to assault.

The learned A.G.A. argued that there was demand of cash of Rs. two lacs. The learned counsel submitted that specific allegation of tying the neck  of the complainant with her Duppata has been made against the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The injuries are of simple nature. The applicant is in jail for the last about one and half months. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Shahid Khan   indicted in case crime No. 160  of 2006  under sections 498-A, 307, 324, 504, 506  I.P.C. and section 3/ 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. Parikshitgarh  District Meerut , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/19623/06

18.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.