Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Babloo v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18642 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16676 (22 September 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court no. 47

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 18642  of 2005

           Ramveer.........Vs.............State of U.P.


Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

This application has been filed by the applicant    Ramveer  with a prayer that he may be released on bail in Case Crime no. 268 of 2005 under Section 302, P.S.   Shamsabad  district Farrukhabad.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that  the  F.I.R. of this case has been lodged by  Maharaj Singh at P.S. Shamsabad on 08.5.2005 at  about 6.30 p.m. in respect of the incident which had occurred on 8.5.2005 at about 1.00 p.m. The F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicant alleging therein that the applicant has committed the murder of his brother-in-law (Sala) deceased Nanhe Lal by gunshot. According to the post mortem examination report the deceased has received firearm wound of entry.

Heard Sri S.D. Kautilya and Sri Manoj Kumar Srivastava learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that there was no motive or intention for the applicant to commit the alleged offence. The alleged occurrence had taken place on account of some misunderstanding. The statement of Maharaj Singh, (P.W. 1), Smt Laung Shree (P.W. 2) and Smt Sharmila (P.W. 3) have been recorded in the trial court,but they have not supported the prosecution story, hence they have been declared hostile. Now there remains no evidence on which the applicant may be convicted, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

            In reply of the above contention the learned A.G.A.  submits that since the trial of the applicant is at the advance stage, it is not proper to appreciate the statements of the witnesses, otherwise it shall prejudice the mind of the trial court, therefore, he may not be released on bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A.,  I am of the view that  at this stage it shall not be proper to appreciate the statements of the witnesses recorded by the trial court, because it may prejudice the mind of the trial court, on the basis of the allegation made in the F.I.R. the applicant caused gunshot injury to the deceased, which is corroborated by the post mortem examination report, the F.I.R. has been promptly lodged  and  without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant  is not entitled for bail, therefore, the prayer for bail is refused.

However, it is directed that the proceedings of the trial shall be expedited on day to day business, without granting unnecessary adjournment.

Accordingly, the bail application is finally disposed of.

Dated:  22 .9.2006



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.