Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S URMILA ICE AND COLD STORAGE versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, PRADESHIK COOPERATIVE DAIRY FED. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S Urmila Ice And Cold Storage v. Managing Director, Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Fed. & Others - WRIT - C No. 56701 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 17631 (12 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.10

             Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 56701 of 2006                        

M/S  Urmila Ice  and Cold Storage.  . . . . . . . . ...  . .  .   .Petitioner.

                                   Versus

Managing Director, Pradeshik

Co-operative Dairy Federation Ltd.

and others.  .  . . .  .  . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . .  . . Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition for a direction to  the respondents  to make payment of the outstanding bills of Rs.3,89,850.20P. as per details contained in paragraph no. 5 of the writ petition as well as interest at the rate of 18% per annum  and also  to decide petitioner's representation dated 5.8.2006 in that regard.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned  counsel  for the  contesting  respondents.

In the facts and  circumstances of the case, we direct the petitioner  to  file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the Writ Petition with all Annexures before the competent authority within three weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned competent authority shall decide the same within twelve weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 12.10.2006

RPP.                                                                                


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.