High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Dhari Lal v. Collector, Siddharth Nagar & Others - WRIT - C No. 57913 of 2006  RD-AH 18008 (19 October 2006)
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner aggrieved by the order passed by Collector dated 28th September, 1995, whereby the application filed by the petitioner has been rejected, preferred revision before the revisional authority, namely, Additional Commissioner, who after hearing learned counsel for the parties vide order dated 18th September, 2006 dismissed the revision and confirmed the order passed by the Collector.
In view of the concurrent findings arrived at by both the authorities, this Court in view of the law laid down holding that no case for review is made out. For this purpose, the Court below has relied upon a decision reported in A.I.R. 2005 (Alld.), 412 - Shiv Ganesh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others. I do not find any error, much less error apparent on the face of record in the order passed by the Court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the order impugned in the present writ petition is either perverse or illegal.
In this view of the matter, the writ petition has no force and is accordingly dismissed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to get his rights adjudicated by filing of a suit. There will be no order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.