High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Salku Singh @ Salik Ram v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6782 of 2006  RD-AH 18988 (9 November 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble K.N. Ojha, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned judgment.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that the appellant has been assigned the role of catching hold the deceased. Moreover, he was allegedly armed with a lathi. The doctor who conducted autopsy found no ante-mortem injury caused by lathi. Moreover, the appellant was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.
The aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the appellant's learned counsel has not been disputed by the learned A.G.A.
In view of the role assigned to the appellant as well as weapon with which he was armed, we are inclined to enlarge the appellant on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Salku Singh @ Salik Ram be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two bonds of sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Shahjahanpur in S.T. No. 236 of 2000 State Vs. Shiv Kumar Singh and others.
If the appellant deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- as fine within a period of one month from today in the court below, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed during pendency of appeal.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.