High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Veer Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19985 of 2006  RD-AH 19158 (13 November 2006)
Court no. 47
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 19985 of 2006
Veer Singh.........Vs.............State of U.P.
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.
Heard Sri V.C. Tiwari, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Manish Tiwari and Sri A.K. Awasthi learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
This is 5th bail application. The applicant is in jail since 25.5.2004. His first bail application was rejected by this court on 1.11.2004 and it was directed that the trial of the applicant shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible. The office was directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial court. The office report shows that in compliance of the order dated 1.11.2004 the office has sent the copy of the aforesaid order to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly on 16.11.2004. Thereafter, the second bail application was moved and the same was rejected by this court on 11.8.2005 and it was directed that the proceedings of the trial be expedited on day to day basis avoiding unnecessary adjournment and again the office was directed to send the copy of this order to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly for strict compliance of the above direction. In compliance of that order the office has sent a copy of the order to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly on 22.8.2005, but it is very surprising that the above mentioned orders passed by this court, directing the court concerned to expedite the proceedings of the trial, have not been obeyed and the trial of the applicant is lingering on for a longer period, whereas it was directed that the proceedings of the trial shall be commenced on day to day basis. In such circumstances it is necessary to call for explanation from the District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly as to why the compliance of the orders passed by this court as mentioned above have not been made, therefore, the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly is directed to submit his explanation within 3 weeks from today.
The applicant was released on short terms bail, but there is no complaint in respect of misuse the same and the proceedings of the trial has not been expedited ignoring the orders of this court. In such circumstances the applicant is also entitled for short terms bail for a period of six months from the date of his release from the jail.
Let the applicant Veer Singh involved in Case Crime No. 15 of 2002, Case No. 613 of 2005, ( State Vs. Veer Singh) pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., 1st Bareilly, , under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Afzalgarh District Bijnor be released on short terms bail for a period of six months from the date of his release from the jail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., 1st, Bareilly with the condition that he shall surrender before the court concerned immediately after the expiry of the period of short terms bail, not tamper with the evidence and cooperate with the trial.
List on 18.12.2006.
The office is directed to send the copy of this order to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly through fax message within two days from today for compliance of the order.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.